- From: Talapady Bhat <talapady.bhat@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:39:26 -0400
- To: "Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- Cc: "Robert N. Goldberg" <robert.goldberg@nist.gov>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi, We have the thermodata built by Robert Goldberg over the last 30 years and let me ask him what does he think about the project. Thanks T N Bhat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp> To: "Talapady Bhat" <talapady.bhat@nist.gov> Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:27 PM Subject: Re: GO as RDF properties > Hi Talapady, > >> Why not use EC number to denote enzyme and use GO as an alias? EC numbers >> are far more popular and more universily known to other databases for >> exchange of information. > > This is for internal use, and I am using GO in my databases here. > >> Also why not use thermodynamics data as well ? > > Actually, I am not trying to create an all-encompassing model yet. I > have a set of very sparse data that I want to get into RDF. In some > cases all I have is the enzyme and an inhibitor - not even the > substrates. By fitting it all to RDF I was hoping to be able to merge > this data with other sources later. If there is thermodynamic info I > will hopefully be able to bolt it on afterwards. > > Tore > > _______________________________________________________________ > Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson ad po.rd.taisho.co.jp] > > >
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 13:40:09 UTC