Re: Clinical terminologies to OWL

Hi Christine,


>
>  EL++, which may shortly
> become a new 'profile' of  OWL 2 that is, a sublanguage of the
> standard.

That's really interesting to hear, and would be a very welcome  
development!!!

I have to admit I was not aware of these effort to allow OWL 1.1 etc.  
to contain EL++ as a sublogic until looking at Kent's paper cited by  
Jyoti,  your notes, and now a few minutes snooping around on the OWL  
site.

I have to say this is all wonderful news that makes this whole project  
even more timely!

John