- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:03:35 -0400
- To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Thanks for the very detailed read! I will do my best to do justice to your comments. Just to address one of your points: The reason for emphasizing non- web naming systems and de-emphasizing URIs is to say that the real goal is clear communication, and that using URIs doesn't give you any magical powers, or any special license for poor documentation, unstable or badly-established denotation, or gratuitous synonymy. We've too often seen odd practices involving URIs that wouldn't have occurred if the perpetrator believed URIs were truly comparable with other naming systems used in durable public communication. (Not all of these have been in http: space, either.) This is very difficult to convey I think. The note represents our best effort so far. Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 14:04:10 UTC