- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:30:27 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, olivier@nlm.nih.gov
- Message-ID: <29af5e2d0709101530r4a248b94u9600792f3974bd6c@mail.gmail.com>
Their first example is missing the verb, although they state that the verb is optional. http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12345 So apparently you can also write *http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/get/12345* ** However, it turns out that this is translated into http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=get&cmd=retrieve&list_uids=12345 Note the db=get ! So the verb, in this case, is being put into the db position. Testing this theory, try using the "verb" gene. In that case it turns out you don't go to pubmed at all. http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/gene/12345 Similarly, if you use a noun "gene", and verb "get" you get a pubmed record (unknown dbs are apparently taken as "pubmed") http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/get/12345 So, it would be nice if this was real, but it doesn't look like it is ready for deployment yet. Probably worth finding out who is responsible and asking whether there is any intention that is be used. If so, perhaps we could work with them to make it as useful as it has the potential to be. Obviously useful would be documentation, access to other formats and versions, and access to some kind of metadata that would present what options there were for versions, formats, as well as persistence policy, etc. -Alan On 9/10/07, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: > > > > "The NCBI Resource Locator provides stable, uniform addressing for NCBI > content, making it easy to link to individual records. Some NCBI resources > also provide services (like search) through these URLs." > > > http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ > > > Looks like a gift. Makes a lie of my assertion that there aren't decent > URIs for NCBI records [in HTML format]. I only found it by trying to track > down a reference in one of Mark Wilkinson's articles. Wish I had known about > it ages ago. > > > Does anyone know more about this, such as a list of allowed <noun>s and > <verb>s? The documentation is pretty spare. > > > Jonathan > > >
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 22:30:34 UTC