- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:09:45 +0200
- To: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@unimib.it>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Andrea Splendiani wrote: > This is not the point. The idea is that a user of a URIs should accept a > commitment to a shared conceptualizazion. > And strictly speaking... information such as authors don't need to be > "in the ontology"... meaning... are we going to define classes in the > real world depending on authors ? (hope this doesn't open a huge thread). If you need to represent publications in your data, then the concept of "author" certainly is important. But I don't know BioPAX well enough to have an opinion on the importance of authorship in BioPAX :-)
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 14:10:13 UTC