W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

RE: [hcls] Harmonization of labels, descriptions and definitions

From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:28:11 -0400
Message-ID: <DBA3C02EAD0DC14BBB667C345EE2D124428503@PHSXMB20.partners.org>
To: <samwald@gmx.at>, "William Bug" <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Cc: <cjm@fruitfly.org>, <olivier@nlm.nih.gov>


This is a very important problem and an early harmonization effort could save a
lot of pain later on (A stitch in time saves nine).

An interesting point to be noted here is that the UMLS and NCI metathesauri 
seek to do a similar thing for medical vocabularies.

Wondering if there's a similar effort being undertaken for biological
ontologies? I know that Gene Ontology is now "linked in" to the UMLS

Maybe Olivier can tell us something more about this.



Vipul Kashyap, Ph.D.
Senior Medical Informatician
Clinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System
Phone: (781)416-9254
Cell: (617)943-7120
To keep up you need the right answers; to get ahead you need the right questions
---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of samwald@gmx.at
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:45 AM
> To: William Bug; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Cc: cjm@fruitfly.org
> Subject: [hcls] Harmonization of labels, descriptions and definitions
> > [2] For instance, definitions in the PATO OWL file (quality.owl) are
> > not visible in Protege.  The OWL version of PATO has an
> > AnnotationProperty called "oboInOwl:hasDefintion" that has the value
> > "@_:A4843".
> I and some other people have already nagged Chris about the representation
> of defintions and synonyms in the OWL versions of OBO ontologies.
> This is partly related to a larger problem, namely the inhomogeneous
> representation of labels, descriptions and definitions among biomedical
> Semantic Web ontologies. I have started a Wiki page on this topic:
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Labels_and_Definitions
> The page is intended to contain the following (please add to it /
> discuss!):
> * Examples from biomedical ontologies of non-standard constructs to
> represent Labels, names, descriptions and definitions of entities.
> * An analysis of the motivations behind the creation of these constructs
> *A description of the problems that arise through a lack of harmonization
> (e.g. for queries and user interfaces)
> * A review of the basic constructs in the RDF, RDFS and OWL vocabularies
> and their intended usage for labels, descriptions and definitions
> * An informal recommendation for the representation of labels,
> descriptions and definitions and suggestions for the harmonization of
> biomedical ontologies in this regard.
> I have started comparing the constructs from a few ontologies, but there
> are many additional ontologies that have created their own style for the
> representation of this information. We should try to find the smallest
> common denominator between all these approaches, because this really is a
> large hindrance to practical interoperability between our ontologies.
> cheers,
> Matthias Samwald
> ----------
> Yale Center for Medical Informatics, New Haven /
> Section on Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vienna /
> http://neuroscientific.net
> .
> --
> GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
> Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail

The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Monday, 28 May 2007 13:29:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC