- From: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:52:00 -0400
- To: samwald@gmx.at
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, cjm@fruitfly.org
- Message-Id: <3D08A697-4552-46E2-A33A-B1870D7DA5B3@DrexelMed.edu>
Thanks for the reminder, Matthias. Cheers, Bill On May 25, 2007, at 11:44 AM, samwald@gmx.at wrote: >> [2] For instance, definitions in the PATO OWL file (quality.owl) are >> not visible in Protege. The OWL version of PATO has an >> AnnotationProperty called "oboInOwl:hasDefintion" that has the value >> "@_:A4843". > > I and some other people have already nagged Chris about the > representation of defintions and synonyms in the OWL versions of > OBO ontologies. > This is partly related to a larger problem, namely the > inhomogeneous representation of labels, descriptions and > definitions among biomedical Semantic Web ontologies. I have > started a Wiki page on this topic: > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Labels_and_Definitions > > The page is intended to contain the following (please add to it / > discuss!): > > * Examples from biomedical ontologies of non-standard constructs to > represent Labels, names, descriptions and definitions of entities. > > * An analysis of the motivations behind the creation of these > constructs > > *A description of the problems that arise through a lack of > harmonization (e.g. for queries and user interfaces) > > * A review of the basic constructs in the RDF, RDFS and OWL > vocabularies and their intended usage for labels, descriptions and > definitions > > * An informal recommendation for the representation of labels, > descriptions and definitions and suggestions for the harmonization > of biomedical ontologies in this regard. > > > I have started comparing the constructs from a few ontologies, but > there are many additional ontologies that have created their own > style for the representation of this information. We should try to > find the smallest common denominator between all these approaches, > because this really is a large hindrance to practical > interoperability between our ontologies. > > cheers, > Matthias Samwald > > ---------- > > Yale Center for Medical Informatics, New Haven / > Section on Medical Expert and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vienna / > http://neuroscientific.net > > > > . > -- > GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. > Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail Bill Bug Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics www.neuroterrain.org Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy Drexel University College of Medicine 2900 Queen Lane Philadelphia, PA 19129 215 991 8430 (ph) 610 457 0443 (mobile) 215 843 9367 (fax) Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
Received on Friday, 25 May 2007 20:49:44 UTC