W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Adding addition OWL & RDF artifacts to the NC RDF repository

From: <samwald@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 21:11:14 +0200
Message-ID: <20070524191114.202090@gmx.net>
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org


> Rather than going through and copy & pasting ALL the OWL & RDF links  
> into a text file, I thought I just send this reminder and cc to  
> Chris, as he may have other ideas about how to get these into the NC  
> repository that don't include error-prone copy & pasting or require  
> someone to write a scraper for this page.

I think that we probably do not want to use (and even import) all of the ontologies in the current OBO collection. We should probably focus on the OBO Foundry ontologies and some of the more consistent OBO Foundry candidates. Some of the ontologies would need some remodelling before they can be integrated into a consistent demo scenario in a really useful way.
For example, the evidence code ontology could better be represented as an ontology of processes of biomedical experiments and techniques.

-- Matthias
-- 
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 19:11:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC