W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

Re: [hcls] Temporal relations, n-ary relations, 4D ontologies

From: Chris Mungall <cjm@fruitfly.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:17:27 -0700
Message-Id: <FA14A84A-2712-484A-8CCC-E17F8B3F0F51@fruitfly.org>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
To: samwald@gmx.at


On May 22, 2007, at 9:09 AM, samwald@gmx.at wrote:

>
>>> In AFO:
>>> -----
>>> <Protein> <has_temporal_part> <Protein_at_timespan_1> .
>>> <Protein_at_timespan_1> <located_in> <cytoplasm> .
>>> -----
>
> Of course, cytoplasm probably also be a full temporal part of a  
> cytoplasm. I did not make that any more explicit, because it does  
> not matter for this example. It would matter even less when we are  
> making statements on a class level ('located_in some cytoplasm').

I think it matters a lot if people are to use AFO and use it  
consistently. What is the domain and range of located_in? things like  
P_at_time_1 or things like P? Or can it be either?

> -- Matthias
>
>
>
>
> .
> -- 
> GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
> Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:17:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC