- From: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:15:14 +0100
- To: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
>>>>> "EJ" == Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch> writes: EJ> Just catching up on reading papers :-) EJ> <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/S3/S2> EJ> "It is also useful to know who believes something and EJ> why. However, there is no standard way of expressing such EJ> information about a statement [...]" EJ> Reification? That's who, not why. The Gene Ontologies evidence codes are and references are much closer. Also, I am not sure of the semantics of reification. Does it mean "I made this statement", "I believe this statement" or "I am the person responsible for the evidence on which this statement is based". All three are independent I think. Phil
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 10:16:40 UTC