W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

Re: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting

From: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:34:16 -0400
To: donald.doherty@brainstage.com
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Message-id: <4638F5C8.7020304@yale.edu>

Hi Don et al,

Thanks a lot for the information and clarification. It looks like we can 
do one or more of the following:

1. To re-submit the HCLS abstract, which was submitted the ISMB highight 
track but got rejected, to the BioOnt Workshop at ISMB. Our original 
goal was to have someone give an oral  presentation and demo if our 
abstract got accepted into the highlight track (our hope was to attract 
a larger bio-audience crowd), but it's fine with me if the group agrees 
to give a poster presentation at the BioOnt Workshop. The only thing is 
that I won't be able to go to ISMB this year so someone else 
(author/co-author(s) of the HCLS paper) would need to prepare and 
present the poster if the abstract is to be submitted and accepted.

2. To submit a new abstract to the Society for Neuroscience for possible 
poster presentation or oral presentation (including a demo?) to the 
neuroscience audience. However, the deadline is very close ...

3. To submit a paper to a journal (regular or special issue) such as BMC 
Bioinformatics, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Nature Biotechnology, 
....

Best,

-Kei


2.    Donald Doherty wrote:

>Kei,
>
>I'm also interested in contributing.
>
>I saw a "due Thursday." This Thursday?!
>
>Note that Society for Neuroscience abstracts are not published in a journal.
>The main value as I see it is to get the demo in front of the intended end
>users (neuroscientists). There are about 35,000 that attend the meeting.
>
>Best wishes,
>Don
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
>[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of jbarkley@nist.gov
>Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:24 AM
>To: Kei Cheung
>Cc: samwald@gmx.at; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; jbarkley@nist.gov
>Subject: Re: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting
>
>
>
>hi kei et al,
>
>I would also like to contribute to the group paper.
>
>thanks,
>
>jb
>
>
>
>Date:  Tue, 01 May 2007 15:39:22 -0400 
>From:  Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu> 
>To:  samwald@gmx.at 
>Cc:  public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org 
>Subject:  Re: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting 
>Quoting Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Matthias et al,
>>
>>It looks like there is some interest in writing a group paper describing 
>>the demo work that is currently going on. Some people have already 
>>proposed a couple of options such as the following:
>>
>>1. ISMB BioOnt Workshop whose proceedings will be published in a 
>>supplement issue of BMC Bioinformatics (is there a publication cost?)
>>2. Society for Neuroscience meeting (will it be published in a journal?)
>>
>>There are also other otpions. For example, there is a special issue 
>>"Semantic BioMed Mashup" of the Journal of Biomedical Informatics 
>>(http://www.elsevier.com/framework_products/promis_misc/jbi_semantic.pdf).
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>I have also seen community papers published in high-profile journals 
>>such as Nature and Science. It depends on the quality of the work, but 
>>it also depends on people's interest, commitment, availability ...
>>
>>The first HCLS paper (which will be published in BMC Bioinformatics 
>>soon) talks about SW visions and use cases in the area of translational 
>>medicine. A new paper paper (if we decide to write one) might focus on 
>>the SW implementation of these visions and use cases. We have more 
>>results now ...
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>-Kei
>>
>>samwald@gmx.at wrote:
>>    
>>
>>> 
>>>  
>>>      
>>>
>>>>It's something that we'd like to see:-)
>>>>
>>>>Phil
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>How much time would we have left to write such a community paper? The
>>>      
>>>
>>original deadline for submissions is May 1 (today).
>>    
>>
>>>If some of us should decide to write such a community paper, I would
>>>      
>>>
>>volunteer to coordinate the collaborative writing via Google Docs. Many of
>>    
>>
>us
>  
>
>>already have some practice in using this system, and I guess it would now
>>work better than the last time.
>>    
>>
>>>-- Matthias Samwald
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>  
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 20:34:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC