- From: Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:53:11 -0400
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EDA07B54F9F8F438E274DD6726FA6FC1448BE@MI8NYCMAIL09.Mi8.com>
Danny, I think you're referring to when Alan was describing the HCLS demo effort: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Banff2007Demo >From what you describe, it does appear to have some bearing on the issues surrounding bio-entities (classes as well as instances however defined), data records of bio-entities, and individual findings referenced in a paper (work). I guess what I'd still like need to see is howthe concepts from our HCLS use-cases would explicitly map to these OCLC concepts... - the work, a distinct intellectual or artistic creation - the expression, the intellectual or artistic realization of a work - the manifestation, the physical embodiment of an expression of a work - the item, a single exemplar of a manifestation. any takers? Eric -----Original Message----- From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny.ayers@gmail.com] Sent: Thu 6/21/2007 11:39 AM To: Eric Neumann Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Re: Notes from Banff f2f On 21/06/07, Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com> wrote: > I've collected the notes from teh Banff f2f discussion and placed the at > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Banff2007/Informal_F2F Thanks. Reminds me, a reference I should pass on. At the f2f Alan mentioned a particular modeling problem - I forget what (sorry, maybe you will recognise) - it involved needing to distinguish between classes/individuals on a lot of different levels. Structurally it reminded me very much of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) [1]. The terms in the RDF version [2] make a good summary. It allows you to talk about e.g. a book "Harry Potter and the Alarming Rash" the conceptual entity, as well as the editions in hardback, paperback etc, as well as this_specific_copy of "Harry Potter and the Alarming Rash" with a coffee stain on page 27. While FRBR itself is pretty much biblio-specific, the general pattern looks like it could well be reusable in other domains. Cheers, Danny. [1] http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/frbr/ [2] http://vocab.org/frbr/core -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 15:53:34 UTC