- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:42:09 +0200
- To: samwald@gmx.at
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
samwald@gmx.at wrote: > After a lot of thinking I have finally decided on the style for the > visualization. I chose a geographical metaphor, here is an example (with > arbitrary connections): > http://neuroweb.med.yale.edu/senselab/temporary_files/map-draft-2.png The metaphor is clearly flawed, or else surely UniProt would be depicted in the center :-) You state that "if two ontologies are mapped in a separate mapping file, there should be a direct connection between both". Does a simple HTTP-based resolver count as a "mapping file"? Also, a resource such as UniProt, while focussed on proteins, has various ontologies that are not restricted to proteins, how to represent that?
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 13:42:20 UTC