- From: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:21:05 -0400
- To: "Smith, Barry" <phismith@buffalo.edu>
- Cc: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, samwald@gmx.at, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, obo-relations@lists.sourceforge.net
Smith, Barry wrote: > At 08:52 PM 5/31/2007, Kei Cheung wrote: > >> Hi Barry, >> >> Welcome to the SWHCLS list. Such a discussion reminds me of the >> Nature paper: "Are the current ontologies in biology good >> ontologies?" >> (http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v23/n9/full/nbt0905-1095.html). >> The paper uses the MGED (microarray) ontology to illustrate some of >> the ontological issues. I'm just curious how the BFO principles and >> practice can help make such a microarray ontology more ontologically >> sound and therefore more machine readable. > > > We are already working on it: > > http://obi.sf.net > > BS > That's great! I hope we can develop some real use case of it. -Kei
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 01:21:22 UTC