- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:22:00 +0200
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>, Benjamin Good <goodb@interchange.ubc.ca>, Natalia Villanueva Rosales <naty.vr@gmail.com>, public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Rees Jonathan <jar@mumble.net>, Mark Wilkinson <markw@illuminae.com>
Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > Perhaps Eric would be so kind as to create > http://purl.uniprot.org/rdf/uniprot/P12345 to link directly to the RDF > document. > > In addition, there is a LINK REL mechanism to link the HTML version to RDF. > > If Eric was in a particularly good mood, maybe he would consider moving > http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345 to > http://purl.uniprot.org/html/uniprot/P12345 if these URLs always return > html documents. The thing is Eric has already got URLs crawling out of his ears... What's the benefit for him to have another PURL for each specific representation of http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345, when he already has http://beta.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345, http://beta.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345.txt, http://beta.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345.rdf, etc? > If he's in an even better mood, perhaps he would even consider > creating http://purl.uniprot.org/record/uniprot/P12345 to denote the > record, without commitment to format, and arrange to have 303 responses > as we have started to do with the HCLS demo. Are there any standards/tools that know what to do with 303 responses?
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 18:23:04 UTC