- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:14:32 -0500 (EST)
- To: samwald@gmx.at
- cc: "Forsberg, Kerstin L" <Kerstin.L.Forsberg@astrazeneca.com>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> Consider that most current medical / patient records are time-oriented mostly
> and rely on a time scale for disambiguation, so there wouldn't be any need to
> say:
> [ a cpr:patient-record ]
> dol:part <urn:uuid:medical-record-db-20/26655>.
> <urn:uuid:medical-record-db-20/26655> a cpr:clinical-description.
>
>
> When you can say
>
> [ a cpr:patient-record ]
> dol:part [ a cpr:clinical-description ].
Sorry, that should be:
[ a cpr:patient-record ]
dol:part <urn:uuid:medical-record-db-20/26655>.
<urn:uuid:medical-record-db-20/26655> a cpr:clinical-description;
dol:has-quality [ time:inXSDDate "1950-01-01"^^xsd:date ]
And
[ a cpr:patient-record ]
dol:part [ a cpr:clinical-description ] dol:has-quality [ time:inXSDDate "1950-01-01"^^xsd:date ]
Where the unique time stamp gives (at least the beginnings) of a mechanism
for uniquely identifyin (via RDF query) the description in question.
Chimezie Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Monday, 29 January 2007 16:14:45 UTC