- From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:43:43 -0500
- To: "William Bug" <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
- Cc: "Donald Doherty" <donald.doherty@brainstage.com>, "public-semweb-lifesci" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2BF18EC866AF0448816CDB62ADF6538105EAF0A2@PHSXMB11.partners.org>
If it makes sense, we could put it on the agenda item for the next BIONT Telcon?
---Vipul
________________________________
From: William Bug [mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:05 PM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: Donald Doherty; public-semweb-lifesci
Subject: Re: Martone's Ontology
By the way, while we're on the topic, there's another very useful ontology which
we certainly want to have on our list of relevant ontologies. It addresses some
of the issues directly relevant to both Use Cases and the issue Don brought up
at the start of this thread - "describing distributions or receptors on a cell,
locations of various processes in a cell" - in this case, for neuronal synapses.
SynDB: a Synapse protein DataBase based on synapse ontology.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra
ctPlus&list_uids=17098931&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum
Again - as I mentioned before, we also want to review this issue with the BioRDF
folks - e.g., confer with Kei on his sense of what relevant TBox structure is
provided in the SenseLab resource - and we should definitely review this issue
with Matthias.
Cheers,
Bill
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Do you mean create a page on the BioONT Wiki where we list URLs pointing to the
OWL files for these ontologies for anyone to view in their favorite OWL editor?
We probably have that already, right?
[VK] Actually, we don't and that would be a good idea as well!
Would you rather have the content of the ontologies set up on a page we can
comment on? That's not so easy to do, though for SAO and for the BIRNLex
ontology, I'd be able to get us access to OWLDoc versions folks could easily
navigate through in a web browser.
[VK] That would be a better and more "readable" idea.... Might be as simple as
taking at text non-xml version of the OWL ontologies...
We sort of need to start building up a collection of ontologies and data
sources as we start building up the use cases...
Just thinking aloud... Feel free to suggest alternate configurations.
---Vipul
THE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED IN THIS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY
FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
AND/OR PRIVILEGED MATERIAL. ANY REVIEW, RETRANSMISSION, DISSEMINATION OR OTHER
USE OF OR TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN RELIANCE UPON, THIS INFORMATION BY PERSONS OR
ENTITIES OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS
INFORMATION IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER AND THE PRIVACY OFFICER, AND
PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THIS INFORMATION.
Bill Bug
Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics
www.neuroterrain.org
Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
Drexel University College of Medicine
2900 Queen Lane
Philadelphia, PA 19129
215 991 8430 (ph)
610 457 0443 (mobile)
215 843 9367 (fax)
Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
THE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED IN THIS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR PRIVILEGED MATERIAL. ANY REVIEW, RETRANSMISSION, DISSEMINATION OR OTHER USE OF OR TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN RELIANCE UPON, THIS INFORMATION BY PERSONS OR ENTITIES OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER AND THE PRIVACY OFFICER, AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THIS INFORMATION.
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 00:44:32 UTC