W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > August 2007

Re: identifier to use

From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:35:49 +0200
Message-ID: <46CD38D5.8090009@isb-sib.ch>
To: Hilmar Lapp <hlapp@duke.edu>
CC: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> I just don't understand the relevance the current usage stats of DOIs in 
> UniProt queries should have for how and in which ways they may be used 
> in the Semantic Web in 3 years from now.

I understood that the apparent success of the DOI system was being used as 
an argument to support the fact that having specialized schemes is not a 
problem? I can only speculate from my little corner; if someone has done a 
more broad survey that would be quite interesting. I do think it's worth 
looking at what has worked well, and what worked less well. Even if the 
future ends up being all different, we don't want to repeat past mistakes! 
Technology may change, but I'm less optimistic about people :-)

> That's a lot of hand-waving there, and quite frankly I'd be depressed if 
> that were all to hope for. However, the good news is that there is an 
> increasing number of digital archive projects whose goal is long-term 
> preservation of data to prevent it from disappearing.

That's exactly what I'm talking about.

 > These archives
 > will all need to use opaque identifiers to track relationships,
 > provenance, versions, and other metadata.

The only digital archive project I'm vaguely familiar with is the Internet 
Archive project, and that seems to relies on URLs. If someone has some 
insight into any of the other projects (especially how they can or can't 
handle different identifier schemes), that would be *really* interesting!

Otherwise, assuming that there will be some unspecified archive projects 
that will benefit from URI scheme x is indeed just a lot of hand-waving ;-)
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 07:36:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:29 UTC