W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > August 2007

RE: identifier to use

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:24:16 -0400
Message-ID: <EBBD956B8A9002479B0C9CE9FE14A6C20314F4E9@tayexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Hilmar Lapp" <hlapp@duke.edu>, "Eric Jain" <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Cc: "Phillip Lord" <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>, "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

> From: Hilmar Lapp
> [ . . . ]
> In the LSID resolver spec resolution doesn't depend on the authority  
> domain name.

Just so you're aware, the *exact* same thing can be achieved with HTTP
URIs, as described here:

For example, given the URI
an agent that is aware of this approach (which is analogous to an agent
being LSID-savvy) could recognize the "http://entrez.example/2007/lsid:"
prefix, replace it with "urn:lsid:" to make the following LSID
> urn:lsid:authority:namespace:identifier:revision
and perform LSID resolution on that.

On the other hand, an agent that is *not* aware of the special
"http://entrez.example/2007/lsid:" prefix (which is analogous to not
being LSID-savvy) *might* be able to find useful information by
dereferencing the URI via HTTP.

David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent
the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2007 19:25:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:29 UTC