- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:58:39 +0100
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > I'm not a fan of frag ids because the establish anarchic behavior > seems impossible to change, and even with the use of it, at least > insofar as the practice of having a single document being returned for > multiple fragids and then having to fish out the relevant portion > goes, I don't see a workable solution. I feel you. But, I thought you were a fan of fragment ids and consider (slash + 303) a hack. :-) In certain way, I think it is a mistake that how the semantics of RDF fragment id is used (i.e., to indicate a non-formation resource.) It would be nice, for example, if another symbol, say "*", is used to indicate such a level of indirection. Then, we can use the #id to label/name a section of the graph. And the use of # will be more consistent with other XML document. But, I guess it is a bit too late now. Xiaoshu
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 11:59:05 UTC