- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:30:42 +0100
- To: ogbujic@ccf.org
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Chimezie, > The employee wants to build an ontology and doesn't have control over > web space. She considers using the tag scheme instead of an HTTP scheme > (with a bogus domain name such as > http://example.com/clinical-medicine/surgical-procedures#minimally-invasive-procedure) because the latter scenario would result in the use of the HTTP scheme which incorrectly suggests (to "follow-you-nose Semantic Web agents" - there is growing number of such software) that they attempt to unnecessarily dereference the terms for more 'useful' information. > But this is a "pyschological" issue, not a "technical one". If the employee didn't invoke LSID library to request the allocation of the LSID URIs space, she is not using LSID. Is there any difference between a bogus LSID URI and a bogus HTTP URI? If she doesn't intend to deploy her ontology on the web, why is she bothered by the "follow-you-nose Semantic Web agents"? I don't know what "follow-you-nose Semantic Web agents" that you have in mind, but do they treat a HTTP 404 resource any differently follow a "can-not-follow-resource"? Xiaoshu
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 14:32:48 UTC