- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:25:24 -0400
- To: "David Decraene" <David@landcglobal.com>
- Cc: w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hello David, I think you are referring to the lack of qualified cardinality restrictions (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/QCR/) The proposed OWL 1.1 includes them and should shortly (in the next few months) be supported by the major OWL reasoners, including Pellet, and FaCT++ (and hence Protege). OWL 1.1 is described at http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/. In the overview search for SROIQ. There is an OWL workshop coming up: http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/ OWLWorkshop06.html Perhaps you should consider attending. Let me know if I've misunderstood. Regards, Alan
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 05:25:59 UTC