RE: Playing with sets in OWL... from Xiaoshu Wang on 2006-09-11 (public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org from September 2006)

From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:24:16 -0400
To: "'Marco Brandizi'" <brandizi@ebi.ac.uk>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006801c6d5e8$a281c3a0$4a741780@bioxiao>

Marco,

> Another problem is that the set could have properties on its own, for
> instance:
> 
> Set1 hasAuthor Jhon
> 
> meaning that John is defining it. But hasAuthor is typically 
> used for individuals, and I wouldn't like to fall in 
> OWL-Full, by making an OWL reasoner to interpret Set1 both as 
> an individual and a class.

Cann't you restrict your hasAuthor property to Jhon with owl:hasValue?

Xiaoshu

Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 21:25:02 UTC