RE: Semantic content negotiation (was Re: expectations of vocabulary)


> There seems lately in these discussions to be an emphasis on 
> making the semantic web useable for the 5% who care about 
> transitive closure and for perfect modularity.  

Point well taken. :-) But it is a chicken and egg thing, don't you think?
But if ontology is not designed right, it cannot be used right either, don't
you think?

By no means am I only interested in these fundamental issues.  Actually all
these thinking on the fundamental issues comes from the practical issues
that I have encountered. 


Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 17:02:37 UTC