- From: Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:39:02 +0000
- To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <06DB6390-334F-4494-ADD4-9BEA2E9D7DFD@cs.man.ac.uk>
Vipul Many thanks for this. And apologies that I've been out of the loop for a long time. Two things I think are missing: i) "What's it for". You touch on this in point 5) "How should ontologies be accesses and used?". However, I think it should be much more prominent. What we will use 'ontologies' for and how they will improve things is more important than saying what they are. We can only determine if we are succeeding if we first say what we are trying to accomplish. 2) "Should" vs "Could" - the two alternate. I would suggest that a focus that links alternatives to outcomes would be more effective. For a given purposes in a situations what are the consequences - advantageous and disadvantageous - of using different technologies/ methodologies / approaches. For illustration, I can think we can identify at least two large categories of use: a) For what I shall call "Reference Information Resources" - which range from things called "databases" - although not necessarily using "database technology" - to things called ontologies such as the OBO family (whether they use 'ontology technology' is not a debate I wish to enter into). The question of what role ontologies and the various technologies associated with ontologies play in such resources is important. How do the different technologies required fit together to meet the different purposes? b) For communication and interworking - from message passing to workflows to agent based software. Others would undoubtedly add more or break them up differently. That's not the point for the Mission and Objectives. That's for the work itself. For now, what is important is to identify that matching purpose and use to methodology and technology are important parts of the group's remit. Regards Alan On 14 Feb 2006, at 17:06, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: > > > <Ontology Working Group Proposal v2.htm> ----------------------- Alan Rector Professor of Medical Informatics Department of Computer Science University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL, UK TEL +44 (0) 161 275 6188/6149 FAX +44 (0) 161 275 6204 www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig www.clinical-esciences.org www.co-ode.org
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 18:54:27 UTC