- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:43:13 -0600
- To: "wangxiao" <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
>Pat, > >> Seems like RDF/A should be relevant here. It will be a draft >> recommendation very soon, time to get ahead of the game? See >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-rdfa-syntax > >Very interesting. Two questions. >(1)If RDF/A becomes a recommendation, does it imply appropriate change will >be made in XHTML/HTML? Because there are many new attributes that would >invalid a X/HTML document. I believe the intent is that RDF/A will be consistent with XHTML in its current form, but check with the RDF/A authors. >(2)What is the relationship between RDF/A and GRDDL? > >If this is the question that I should ask at another interet group, please >point me to there. :-) Sound like issues you should raise on public-swbp-wg@w3.org. There may be something in the archives http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/ . There seem to be a lot of references in there to GRDDL. I confess to not having been following this WG activity in close detail, only the near-final result. Pat >Xiaoshu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:43:23 UTC