- From: Kevin C. Abbey <kevinabbey@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:26:17 -0400
- To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Dear List Members, In response to Eric Millers statement @ http://www.w3.org/2005/04/swls/: "Many participants of the Workshop who are now implementing semantic web technologies to solve life science problems, or who are considering options for doing so, expressed interest in an ongoing forum for sharing implementation experience. The public-semweb-lifesci list provides a forum for these discussions." To those participants who are now implementing semantic web technologies: I have been learning about this work over the past few months in my free time as I search for employment. If there is an opportunity in industry or academics for an application developer/tester/troubleshooting or a student to work on an implementation, I am available and interested to get started ASAP. Please email me directly for more information (kevinabbey@gmail.com). To those who are considering options for doing so: The ISO standard for Topic Maps has remained unused as far as I know in the life sciences. From the few applications that I have tried and read about I see great potential for topic map use in additon to current efforts. I expect they will eventually interoperable with RDF (see this link for details http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/RDFTM/) . Is there a reason for not using the applications/standard of topic maps? In terms of the Mission statement: I do not know the origin of RDF but topic maps originated from the problem of index building. As this new charter is challenged to work together with the many related association/projects it may be useful to use the technology as a tesing platform to organize and navigate the workspace. Basically a common index & visual map should reduce the complexity of the coordination between the organizations. Since the work is developing in time, a wiki would also be useful where a topic map is limited. However if the topic map could be developed in wiki ways then we could have the best of both. I searched for such an application and found a beginning project called topiki but nothing completed as far as I know: http://www.shelter.nu/blog-070.html & http://www.infoloom.com/pipermail/topicmapmail/2004q1/005777.html Is there any interest in setting up such a system (topic map, wiki or topiki) or is there another alternative (in addition to the traditional reports)? Thank you, Kevin C .Abbey
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2005 07:37:04 UTC