- From: Eric Neumann <eneumann@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:41:12 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8702043.1120239672352.JavaMail.gbourne@brunch.mit.edu>
Here are the notes (with Joanne's help) from last Tuesdays BOF at ISMB: Eric ************************************************************** Eric Neumann (slides attached): - Presentation of SW background and Current Activities - Potential areas of further development for life sciences - What else should we address? David states: - wrappers are layers away from the data. - what are best practices for citation and provenance? - seamless integration is plagarism. - Must drill down and get credit-- need for papaer-trails. - No standard (nor implementation) for obtaining provenance with LSID's. - Need to create best practices to ensure it is a standard. To make sure the original source is available, push and pull techologies can help. Eric: - RSS is a good idea for data updates, tool updates, etc. - Urchin and PRISM and connotea from NPG are relevant for provenance. - How to migrate between different versions? RSS 1.0 is RDF. RSS 0.9, 2.0 is XML. Converters exist (such as Dennis Quan's) Andrew: - How is metadata updated? Not in LSID specification; needs to be defined still Gary: - Semantic Web for Life Sciences at PSB 2006 Call for Papers. Mid-July for deadline. Dennis Q: - XML has this (metadata, structure versioning)) problem, too. Gary Bader: - How do we solve the ID problem? David States: - Named ID's and text don't necessarily refer to a database entry? CAn be concepts or abstract entities.
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: SW-BOF2005.ppt
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 23:07:36 UTC