- From: Mark Foltz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:58:24 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
@anssiko @schien Given what we are looking at now I would be okay with relaxing the exit criteria to: > Additionally, implementations of the receiving user agent conformance class must include at least one implementation of the 1-UA mode *or* one implementation of the 2-UA mode" I think this is reasonable, given that most all implementations of the receiving user agent will either be one or the other, but not both; they will be a full fledged Web renderer and implement 2-UA, or they will have simpler software to render video streams and implement 1-UA. For the controlling UA we should continue to require both, since it can't predict what kind of displays will be available. If I can line up resources to implement 2-UA in Chrome on the current timeline, we can always revise the exit criteria back to the stronger version. @schien Would like to get an update from Mozilla and hear their thoughts as well. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mfoltzgoogle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/406#issuecomment-289128373 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 24 March 2017 19:58:31 UTC