- From: Anton Vayvod <avayvod@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 01:41:45 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mlamouri@google.com>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOjek6pJfip2=R68r2krz60T5C4gjkHxmdXV6Qfm0U_6AAgAHg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:11 AM Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Anton, Francois, All, > > > On 27 Oct 2016, at 00:11, Anton Vayvod <avayvod@google.com> wrote: > > > > The Remote Playback API implementation in Chromium is nearing a > milestone where we would like to ship the API enabled by default. > > The Chrome Web platform team usually wants to see a TAG review of the > spec. > > > > If there're no concerns voiced here, I'd like to request the TAG group > to review the RemotePlayback API. > > If you want me to highlight some issues specifically, please, let me > know. > > I suggest we publish a new Working Draft before we do the wide review, so > that people have a stable snapshot to look at. The spec seems ready for a > new WD after some SoTD adjustments (below). > > Anton - would you be fine with us staging the current ED for WD > publication now? > Yes, I'm fine with it. Thanks Anssi! > > It would be good to update the SoTD section, clarify the "This document is > a work in progress and is subject to change" note to better reflect reality > knowing implementations are coming together. Also, note the status of > existing issues. My assessment says the remaining open issues are > considered minor, except issue #41 that suggests extensions to > HTMLMediaElement and HTMLVideoElement interfaces; would be good to note > this explicitly to attract further feedback and suggestions during wide > review. Let me know if you feel the same. > > The reason for updating SoTD is simply to make it easier for people > outside this group reading the wide review spec to be informed of the > stability and completeness of the spec, and give better feedback. > > Francois - could you update the SoTD to match the wide review > expectations? After that's done I'll initiate WD publication process. > > Also, I'd be happy if you Francois could submit the wide review request > for this API to appropriate WGs and horizontal group after we've published > the new WD. I think we should include in the review request the same groups > we did include for the Presentation API. > > All - please let us know by 2 November if you feel the spec should not > advance to wide review, and please include your reasons. Silence is > considered consent. We'll try to publish a new WD on 3 November followed by > a wide review request soon after. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi (WG Chair)
Received on Friday, 28 October 2016 01:42:28 UTC