- From: Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 07:33:56 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
Thanks @mfoltzgoogle for crafting this substantial PR. All - this PR has been open for 2 weeks, so my expectation is everyone has had time to review it. The comments received have been addressed by the editor sans @mounirlamouri's https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/pull/316#discussion_r67614836 that suggested using a single `[Constructor]` with a union type `(DOMString[] or DOMString)` as its argument over the use of multiple `[Constructor]` extended attributes `[Constructor(DOMString url), Constructor(DOMString[] urls)]`. @mounirlamouri could you clarify the compatibility issue? Meanwhile, I'll merge merge this PR, with a condition that we may switch to the union type if the compatibility impact is deemed significant. -- GitHub Notification of comment by anssiko Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/pull/316#issuecomment-228721656 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2016 07:34:04 UTC