W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > June 2016

Re: [presentation-api] CR Exit criteria

From: Mark Foltz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:28:39 +0000
To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-223461079-1464913719-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Overall this looks pretty good, a few questions.

- Should we define "feature"? Or is that defined implicitly by the 
test suite for each conformance class?
- If (for example) Chrome implemented the 1-UA receiving user agent 
and Mozilla implemented the 2-UA receiving user agent, that would 
fulfill the criteria of having two interoperable and independent 
implementations of the receiving user agent conformance class, 
correct?
- Editing comment: Should the first sentence of each definition be 
capitalized? :)



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mfoltzgoogle
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/pull/314#issuecomment-223461079
 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 June 2016 00:28:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 June 2016 00:28:42 UTC