Re: [presentation-api] [meta] Publish Candidate Recommendation

@anssiko, I agree that #202 (Presentations without communication 
channel) can be considered a new feature and defered to v2. I updated 
issue labels accordingly.

Although not explicit in the [CR 
requirements](https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#candidate-rec),
 publication as CR normally implies that known technical issues have 
been addressed and more generically that the group has solved all 
issues that could lead to normative changes in the spec. We also need 
to demonstrate that the specification has undergone wide review.

As such, I would add at least the following issues to the list of 
issues to be solved before CR:

- #162 Evaluate Presentation API against the Media Accessibility User 
Requirements spec
- #163 PresentationSession should have stream interfaces!
- #218 Possibility for a character to be interpreted differently 
depending on locale
- #241 bufferedAmount property on PresentationConnection
- #253 Have the receiving browsing context generate the presentation 
identifier?
- #254 When is the first presentation connection created in the 
receiving browsing context?
- #269 Only allow one PresentationAvailability per PresentationRequest
- #273 PresentationConnectionClosedEventInit.message needs to have a 
default value

Some of these issues may need to be discussed at the F2F, but most of 
them simply need some sort of "PR" (Pull Request or Proposed 
Resolution). Essentially, I'd like to propose the same game as in 
January: let's kill some issues so that the spec may be published as 
CR shortly after the F2F!


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tidoust
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/276#issuecomment-206377135
 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 13:38:11 UTC