Re: Feedback on Second Screen

Hi,

> On 26 Aug 2015, at 06:21, timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Some quick comments on Second Screen [1]
> (comments likely apply more than once).

Thanks for the comments.

>> If the presentation message type is text, then initialize event's data attribute to the contents of presentation message data of type DOMString.
>> If the presentation message type is binary, and binaryType is set to blob, then initialise [sp] event's data attribute to a new Blob object that represents presentation message data as its raw data.
> 
> -ize (as in the previous line...)

Fixed.

>> The mechanism used to monitor presention [sp] displays availability and determine the compatibility of a presentation display with a given URL is left to the user agent.
> 
>> The term DOMException is defined in [WEBIDL].
> 
>> This document provides interface definitions using the [WEBIDL] standard.
> a bit late, no?

If you mean a bit late in relative to other terms, I'd say the current ordering is fine.

>> The terms Promise, ArrayBuffer, and ArrayBufferView are defined in [WEBIDL].
> 
> 
>>   // as soon as it's not needed.
> 
> i favor `it isn't`

A cursory search on other specs shows no clear preference either way.

>>   // available for simplicity (one could implement the third state for the button).
> 
> the third => a third

Fixed.

Your feedback has been baked into a PR:

https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/pull/188

Thanks,

-Anssi (WG chair)

> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/presentation-api/

Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 13:36:38 UTC