- From: Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:13:16 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
@mounirlamouri Please submit a PR with your proposal. It is probably easier for the participants to review the changes in context. I suggest you update the conformance section to match in the same PR (you can borrow the language from https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/93) and cross-reference the conformance classes appropriately. As long as the spec is clear to implementers (what must be implemented/tested) and authors (albeit there are surely better API docs for web developers than specs) on the division, we should be fine with @mounirlamouri's proposal even if the spec would end up being a bit more verbose that way. The extra editorial cost will pay off. -- GitHub Notif of comment by anssiko See https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/91#issuecomment-138535506
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 12:13:17 UTC