- From: François Daoust via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:40:01 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
I like the idea of sticking to the `navigator.presentation` namespace. That's more an editorial point perhaps but since we'll end up with two conformance classes in the spec, it seems good to have separate IDL for each class of products to be able to say "the controlling user agent MUST implement the interface defined in section X.Y." instead of "the controlling user agent MUST implement the `defaultRequest` attribute of the `Presentation` interface". How would you define the resulting `Presentation` interface in the spec, @mounirlamouri ? An empty interface completed with two `partial` interfaces, one with `defaultRequest` and the other with `receiver`? -- GitHub Notif of comment by tidoust See https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/91#issuecomment-136962993
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2015 07:40:09 UTC