Re: F2F agenda (29-30 Oct 2015)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote:

> Couple of comments about the agenda:
> - Issue 194: I thought we agreed that it was mostly syntax sugar and we
> shouldn't worry about it at the moment.
>

Agreed, closed issue.


> - Issue 13: if we discuss this during the afternoon, Anton and I will
> try to join. Otherwise, we should have some more info about our work
> before TPAC anyway.
>
> Regarding the process, I expect that all decisions made during the F2F
> will be up for review in the mailing list for people not present to be
> able to have there say?
>

Yes - at the first F2F all GitHub issues resolved had a comment attached
with the proposed resolutions for further comment.  After a period of time
(a week?) without further comment the the issues were closed.


>
> Thanks,
> -- Mounir
>
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 12:56, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On 07 Oct 2015, at 21:31, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The agenda looks pretty full, but if there is time, Anton and Mounir
> would like to report on progress on this issue and open it for feedback.
> (I will be presenting on their behalf.)
> > >
> > > https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/13
> >
> > Thanks for the proposal.
> >
> > I added this to the Day 1 after lunch (depending on how efficient we are
> > in resolving P1/P2s, we may move this to Day 2):
> >
> >   https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Meetings/Oct_2015_F2F#Agenda
> >
> > We did discuss this feature at our previous F2F, so it is good to have an
> > update on the topic, and see whether there is interest from other
> > implementers and support for moving this to the Rec Track.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Anssi
> >
> >
>