- From: François Daoust via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:46:10 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
The sentence "User agents must accept a presentationUrl using the http or https schemes" sounds very normative to me, which looks strange in a note that is informative-only by definition. I suggest to rewrite to: ```html <p class="note">The <code>presentationUrl</code> should name a resource accessible to the local or a remote user agent. This specification defines behavior for <code>presentationUrl</code> using the <code>http</code> or <code>https</code> schemes; behavior for other schemes is not defined by this specification.</p> ``` Note that user agents will de facto be required to support http and https schemes because algorithms will mandate behavior in such cases. As such, there should be no need to add an extra normative statement such as "user agents MUST support presentationUrl using the http or https schemes". The "should" in "The presentationUrl should name a resource accessible" could also be read as normative but it does not apply to user agents, so less of a problem. -- GitHub Notif of comment by tidoust See https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/pull/96#issuecomment-106214851
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 07:46:14 UTC