Re: Timing of TAG review

> On 19 Jun 2015, at 14:48, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-06-18 22:52, mark a. foltz wrote:
>> Anssi, Francois,
>> 
>> I just wanted to check-in on the timing of the TAG review.  The issues
>> noted as being high priority for TAG review [1] have had (or will have)
>> some proposal put forward in the spec, so this may be a good time to
>> move this forward.
>> 
>> Given the number of pull requests that have landed recently, I think a
>> whole-document editorial pass to make sure terminology, structure, and
>> markup are consistent would be a good idea.  Then, perhaps we can
>> publish a working draft using the new process for TAG review.
> 
> That all makes sense to me :)
> 
> Anssi, although that directly follows from resolutions and actions agreed upon at the F2F, given the number of updates that were made, I wonder if we shouldn't turn that into a proper call for consensus that would ask everyone here to:
> 
> 1. review latest changes, with a specific focus on making sure that terminology, structure, and markup are consistent ;
> 2. note the anticipated changes that are still pending (but certainly not forgotten) ;
> 3. agree with the plan to publish an updated Working Draft and to ask the TAG, Privacy IG (PING) and Web Security IG for an initial review and specific feedback on issues labeled "TAG":
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/labels/TAG
> 
> That means another 10 days or so before going to the TAG, but that would give time for everyone to do a whole-document editorial pass. What do you think?

This sounds all good. I'll send a CfC to this list soon.

Assuming no concerns, and with a week long review, my expectation is that with the help of Echidna we should be able to publish an updated Working Draft on 30 June 2015 if we're really agile :-)

Thanks,

-Anssi (WG chair)

Received on Monday, 22 June 2015 14:19:12 UTC