W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Moving the new publication process

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:03:52 +0200
Message-ID: <55789828.8090403@w3.org>
To: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
CC: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
On 2015-06-09 22:35, Francois Daoust wrote:
> On 2015-06-09 19:25, mark a. foltz wrote:
>> So I would vote for c).
> OK. Whatever the option, it all starts with making a few updates to the
> spec and possibly Makefile to ease the work. I'll work on that.

I prepared something, see last pull request:

In the end, I settled for a combination of using a specific "TR" Git 
branch for Working Drafts and a separate "releases/WD.html", the former 
to keep working drafts somewhat hidden in the GitHub repo and to be able 
to trigger Travis CI on appropriate push commands, and the latter not to 
have to merge an index.html file that would be the Editor's Draft in the 
"gh-pages" branch and a Working Draft in the "TR" branch. See the pull 
request for details.

Hope that works for you. If not, we can easily tweak what I did to adopt 
another mechanism.

I made a few updates to the source spec to make it pubrules compliant 
and ready for publication.


PS: In case you're wondering what is behind the "secure" encrypted 
portion of the Travis CI configuration file, it is an encrypted version 
of the publication token that Echidna uses to authenticate the 
publication request, as explained in:
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 20:04:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:18:56 UTC