- From: François Daoust via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:18:49 +0000
- To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
@mfoltzgoogle I'm definitely fine with adopting ReSpec. I note that the manual step to generate the HTML of a spec to publish can now be done by Echidna directly when it publishes the spec, and that ReSpec also has some (not well documented) support for Markdown [1]. There may exist a few additional differences between the tools with respect to WebIDL and cross references, for instance on ways to reference attributes from an interface from different sections in the spec. [1] https://github.com/tobie/respec-example -- GitHub Notif of comment by tidoust See https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/116#issuecomment-121953289
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 13:18:51 UTC