W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > July 2015

Re: [presentation-api] Spec authoring tool migration

From: François Daoust via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:18:49 +0000
To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-121953289-1437052729-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@mfoltzgoogle I'm definitely fine with adopting ReSpec.

I note that the manual step to generate the HTML of a spec to publish 
can now be done by Echidna directly when it publishes the spec, and 
that ReSpec also has some (not well documented) support for Markdown 
[1].

There may exist a few additional differences between the tools with 
respect to WebIDL and cross references, for instance on ways to 
reference attributes from an interface from different sections in the 
spec.

[1] https://github.com/tobie/respec-example

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by tidoust
See 
https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/116#issuecomment-121953289
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 13:18:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 16 July 2015 13:18:51 UTC