- From: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:21:19 -0800
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALgg+HGi_T8mg=tdX9BSQMYoT5Jnjzheing6YJ9W5FabAdV8Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Anssi, The pull request LGTM. Am I to assume that all the paragraphs classed "XXX" require expansion to complete this iteration of the spec? Mark On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > [Hat off] > > I crafted a PR [1] that attempts to structure the specification text a bit > differently. This pass is an editorial in nature and no normative changes > were introduced (not intentional, at least). An HTML review is available at > [2]. > > In the current Presentation API spec [3], the IDL blocks and the > algorithms are in their own sections, in "Interfaces" and "Algorithms" > sections respectively. However, many specs (such as HTML, DOM, many Web > APIs) use a style where the prose and related algorithms immediately follow > the respective IDL blocks. In this attempt, I merged the two similarly. On > the same pass I tried to make sure all the interface members have > definitions in the prose. IOW, if you click an IDL member in any of the IDL > blocks at [2], you should land in the prose where the respective IDL member > is defined. > > I added some placeholder text too that has been annotated with green boxes > -- the boxes themselves are just an aide to help visually review what has > been added, and we'll drop the styling after review. Placeholders that seem > to require expansion, are followed by ellipses (...). > > For consistency with other specs, we may want to consider adopting a > structure along these lines. We can use [2] as a starting point if deemed > helpful. > > Btw. I opened an issue re carving out the Requirements and Example > sections [4] into its own doc. That's an enhancement we can do at a later > stage -- if the group thinks it is a good idea. An example of such a [very > extensive] UCs and Reqs doc is at [5]. > > [Hat on] > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/pull/41 > [2] http://rawgit.com/anssiko/presentation-api/reorg/index.html > [3] http://w3c.github.io/presentation-api/ > [4] https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/42 > [5] http://w3c-webmob.github.io/installable-webapps/ >
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 00:22:12 UTC