- From: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:29:16 -0700
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALgg+HEtM4kQAQifX-n8jxuAZD73M6HKrQavj2-_Qxys21-gOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Anssi, All, That plan sounds good to me. I will plan on publishing a new WD on Friday. I recently sent a summary of the substantial (normative) changes to the mailing list committed since the last WD on July 1. m. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi < anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > Hi All, MarkFo, > > > On 17 Aug 2015, at 11:52, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > There has been good progress made to the ED since the latest WD > published on 1 July 2015. Also implementations seem to have made progress, > which is encouraging as that leads us to the topic of test suite > development in the near future as we advance on the Rec Track. > > > > Once the recent changes to the ED have been stabilized I suggest we > publish another WD. Before publishing: > > > > * Please let the group know the changes you'd like the group to review > more carefully (if any). > > The findings from the recent bug triage by Mounir and Anton [2] and > related implementation feedback (intent to ship [3]) seem to suggest the > latest Editor's Draft [4] is stable enough to warrant a new TR/WD snapshot. > > > * Also, it would be helpful to briefly summarize the normative changes > that have been baked in the ED since the WD publication on 1 July. > > I produced an HTML diff [5] showing the differences between the most > recent published Working Draft (1 July 2015) and the latest Editor's Draft > to aid you in reviewing the normative changes. This is the most accurate > and hopefully rather readable paper trail of the changes. > > > For publishing, we'd use the usual Echidna-assisted process [1]. > > All - please review the latest spec [4] and its diff [5] and let us know > by Thu 27 Aug if you identify blockers or issues that should be resolved > before publishing a new Working Draft. Please note a revised Working Draft > does not need to be perfect as the name implies. Per the process we should > publish a new WD when there have been significant changes to the previous > published document that would benefit from review beyond the Working Group. > > MarkFo - if there are no concerns, please publish a new Working Draft on > Fri 28 Aug (assuming you're back in the office and Echidna co-operates with > ReSpec :-)). > > Thanks, > > -Anssi (WG chair) > > [1] > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Work_Mode#Publication_as_Working_Draft > [2] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-secondscreen/2015Aug/0058.html > [3] > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/YKVnS429hns/2vBv0iQVCwAJ > [4] http://w3c.github.io/presentation-api/ > [5] > http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2015%2FWD-presentation-api-20150701%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fpresentation-api%2F > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 21:30:06 UTC