W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Publish a new WD - review by 27 Aug

From: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:29:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CALgg+HEtM4kQAQifX-n8jxuAZD73M6HKrQavj2-_Qxys21-gOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Cc: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
Anssi, All,

That plan sounds good to me.  I will plan on publishing a new WD on Friday.

I recently sent a summary of the substantial (normative) changes to the
mailing list committed since the last WD on July 1.

m.


On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <
anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi All, MarkFo,
>
> > On 17 Aug 2015, at 11:52, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > There has been good progress made to the ED since the latest WD
> published on 1 July 2015. Also implementations seem to have made progress,
> which is encouraging as that leads us to the topic of test suite
> development in the near future as we advance on the Rec Track.
> >
> > Once the recent changes to the ED have been stabilized I suggest we
> publish another WD. Before publishing:
> >
> > * Please let the group know the changes you'd like the group to review
> more carefully (if any).
>
> The findings from the recent bug triage by Mounir and Anton [2] and
> related implementation feedback (intent to ship [3]) seem to suggest the
> latest Editor's Draft [4] is stable enough to warrant a new TR/WD snapshot.
>
> > * Also, it would be helpful to briefly summarize the normative changes
> that have been baked in the ED since the WD publication on 1 July.
>
> I produced an HTML diff [5] showing the differences between the most
> recent published Working Draft (1 July 2015) and the latest Editor's Draft
> to aid you in reviewing the normative changes. This is the most accurate
> and hopefully rather readable paper trail of the changes.
>
> > For publishing, we'd use the usual Echidna-assisted process [1].
>
> All - please review the latest spec [4] and its diff [5] and let us know
> by Thu 27 Aug if you identify blockers or issues that should be resolved
> before publishing a new Working Draft. Please note a revised Working Draft
> does not need to be perfect as the name implies. Per the process we should
> publish a new WD when there have been significant changes to the previous
> published document that would benefit from review beyond the Working Group.
>
> MarkFo - if there are no concerns, please publish a new Working Draft on
> Fri 28 Aug (assuming you're back in the office and Echidna co-operates with
> ReSpec :-)).
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi (WG chair)
>
> [1]
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Work_Mode#Publication_as_Working_Draft
> [2]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-secondscreen/2015Aug/0058.html
> [3]
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/YKVnS429hns/2vBv0iQVCwAJ
> [4] http://w3c.github.io/presentation-api/
> [5]
> http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2015%2FWD-presentation-api-20150701%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fpresentation-api%2F
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 21:30:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 August 2015 21:30:06 UTC