W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Bug triage: heads up

From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:43:44 +0100
Message-Id: <1440146624.1197954.362063841.092B046C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
FYI, I applied the changes and removed the mention of three closed bugs
from the specification.

-- Mounir

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, at 09:25, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:
> Hi Mounir, Anton, All,
> 
> > On 18 Aug 2015, at 18:14, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Anton and I did a triage of the bugs currently opened in the GH issue
> > tracker. For each bug, we decided whether it felt into one of these
> > categories:
> > - To close (already fixed or not really relevant/no need to track)
> > - Pri-1: major issue that need to be resolved sooner than later, usually
> > blockers for implementations
> > - Pri-2: minor issues that should be looked at at some point
> > - Pri-3: editorial issues or feature requests, nothing really blocking
> 
> Thanks you for your hard work of triaging the bugs. I updated the group's
> Work Mode re priorities:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Work_Mode#Priorities
> 
> All - please review the suggestions by Mounir and Anton and respond if
> you spot issues [sic].
> 
> Below are my comments on the bugs to close with my chair hat off:
> 
> > This is our result:
> > #9: To close, was solved
> 
> OK.
> 
> > #10: To close, part of the privacy consideration
> 
> OK. PING review results may provide further input, but can re-open if
> needed.
> 
> > #13: To close, create another spec
> 
> OK.
> 
> > #14: Pri-2
> > #18: Pri-2, but we have a resolution
> > #19: To close, seems to have been solved
> 
> OK.
> 
> > #20: To close, not an issue
> 
> OK. Again, PING was asked for feedback.
> 
> > #21: Pri-3
> > #26: To close, solved
> 
> OK.
> 
> > #32: Pri-3, feature request
> > #35: Pri-1, recent discussions
> > #40: Pri-3, feature request
> > #45: no change (Pri-2)
> > #61: Pri-3, feature request
> > #67: To close, discovering should be enough + UA implementation (or
> > Pri-3)
> 
> Suggest we keep this open with Pri-3 since there are volunteers
> investigating this issue.
> 
> > #68: To close, unless action items missing
> 
> Seems OK to close since the UCs and Reqs doc looks good to me. The group
> will continue to maintain that doc as the API evolved but no need to
> track that in an issue.
> 
> > #79: Pri-2, maybe use sandbox?
> > #80: Pri-2
> > #86: Pri-2
> > #91: Pri-1
> > #92: Pri-2, Mozilla is owning it
> > #93: Pri-2, names and definitions only
> > #97: Duplicate of #40
> 
> Agreed, can reference #97 in #40 and close.
> 
> > #99: Pri-1
> > #112: Pri-3, editorial
> > #148: Pri-3, mostly editorial
> > #149: Pri-1, missing feature
> > #150: To close
> 
> OK. Although should keep the Fullscreen API on the back of our minds.
> Perhaps a note in the spec in an appropriate place?
> 
> > #152: Pri-1
> > #153: nothing to change (Pri-1)
> > #154: Pri-3, editorial
> > 
> > I am going to apply these changes to the bugs tomorrow. If you disagree
> > with something, feel free to point it now. Otherwise, the bugs can
> > always be re-opened and their priority changed.
> 
> 
> We can and should re-open closed issues later on if participants do not
> have time to review these by today (I believe many are still on vacation
> in EU). In particular, I'd like to make sure MarkFo reviews these changes
> when he's back in the office.
> 
> Mounir, Anton - some of these issues suggested to be closed are reference
> from the spec. Please submit a PR to sync the spec when you update the
> issues.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Anssi 
Received on Friday, 21 August 2015 08:44:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 August 2015 08:44:16 UTC