- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:22:00 -0800
- To: "'Kostiainen, Anssi'" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, "'Rottsches, Dominik'" <dominik.rottsches@intel.com>, <public-secondscreen@w3.org>, <public-webscreens@w3.org>
Hi All, Allow me to very briefly introduce myself. My name is John Foliot, and I am a web accessibility specialist. I spend a fair bit of my volunteer time at the W3C, and related to "media / video", I was one of the authors of the Media Accessibility User Requirements - http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/media-a11y-reqs/. I follow this list mostly out of interest, and to "keep an eye on" developments as they evolve. I am writing this group today to make a small but important request. Could I ask that when posting to either of these lists, that the subject line clearly indicate the list target? (For example, you will note I added [Second Screen], which is a frequently used convention). As personally I manage multiple W3C mailing lists in my inbox, this would make it extremely simple to do: conversely an email with the subject line "Issue Priorities" is, uhm, relatively vague when taken out of context. At any rate, this is just a suggestion, and requires that the group make an effort to do this. If you all deem it too much, that's fine, but I wrote to ask you to consider it, and I will thank you for taking the time to do just that :-) Cheers! JF ------------------------------ John Foliot Web Accessibility Specialist W3C Invited Expert - Accessibility Co-Founder, Open Web Camp > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 4:41 AM > To: Rottsches, Dominik; public-secondscreen@w3.org; public- > webscreens@w3.org > Subject: Issue priorities > > Hi All, > > Since we start to have a good list of issues [1], I'd ask the editor, > with the help of the group, to take a first stab at assigning > priorities to the issues. GH makes the priority setting easy using > labels. To keep this simple, we could use: > > P1 = High > P2 = Med > P3 = Low > > I suggest the primary responsibility is on the editor to ensure the > issue priorities reflect the group's consensus. > > To give more context, other labels (bug, duplicate, enhancement etc.) > could be used in addition to P{1,2,3}. > > [Later on, we can create milestones that map to the standards track > stages (First Public Working Draft, Last Call, Candidate Rec etc., see > [2]) and associate the issues with the milestones.] > > I think this would help not only the group's current participants, but > also new people who are still joining the group, to have a shared > understanding of the priorities. > > I've documented this proposal in the Work Mode wiki at [3]. > > All - comments and suggestions welcome. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues > [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#recs-and-notes > [3] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Work_Mode
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 16:22:49 UTC