- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 05:09:24 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Thanks @manuel-j-diaz for the report and solution. I'm hoping to get to a revision of OWL-Time in a few months time. It is already underway but work is currently suspended. Preview: https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ Question: would it be better still to define additional datatypes time:gDay, time:gMonth, time:gYear with the lexical pattern further constrained to match Gregorian calendar rules - i.e. no more than 31 days in a month, 12 months in a year? Good to know that your OWL 2 processors cope OK with lexical patterns. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1461#issuecomment-4021171663 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 9 March 2026 05:09:25 UTC