- From: Luís de Sousa via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:50:46 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
@situx proj4rdf is a strong starting point, of which I haven't heard before. Intuitively, the easiest path would be to derive a web ontology from the CRS domain model underpinning WKT (or GML). That path would also make it easy for programmes like PROJ to adopt a RDF syntax. I am on board to work further on this. But I see a more elementary issue with the bundling of the CRS with the geometry itself in GeoSPARQL. A CRS object property with `Feature` and `FeatureCollection` as domains would be more logical and easier to use. Forgive if this was already discussed in the context of version 1.1. @prushforth A CRS web ontology and a CRS registrar are different topics. Although the latter is certainly important, it is far from being the ultimate goal of a web ontology. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ldesousa Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1436#issuecomment-1833263384 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2023 07:50:48 UTC