- From: Rob via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 22:17:15 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
I note several references in the wild to the concept of "W3C maintenance groups", but nothing in the process document (https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/#WGCharter). something like this would be useful for SOSA but new work needs a new charter. The other item I think that needs a home is for GeoSPARQL to be a viable target for JSON-LD annotation of GeoJSON (basis of OGC APIs) and FG-JSON extensions. There are several possibilities for this, via direct support for the same granular elements of geometry or via formal alignments to a GeoJSON ontology. My conclusion is that there is a bigger architectural piece of work the OGC needs to complete to define and test ideas before settling on a scope for specifications, however perhaps a joint WG could be chartered that takes this into account. Given nature of W3C timeboxed specification WGs perhaps some sort of joint roadmap is appropriate instead however, in the context of a persistent Community Group. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1436#issuecomment-1830847383 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2023 22:17:17 UTC