- From: Peter Parslow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:11:13 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
As chair of ISO/TC 211 I am in principle in favour of mentioning our standards! However, we (the SDW WG) do not mention OGC WMS / ISO 19128 as a best practice implementation because we believe that in practice, OGC WMTS is preferable. This is because of the complexity of setting up the server infrastructure of a "full" WMS where you have no real control over what you will be expected to return to a request. (At least, that's what my team tell me) -- GitHub Notification of comment by PeterParslow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1437#issuecomment-1825356940 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 24 November 2023 09:11:15 UTC