- From: Kathi Schleidt via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:59:56 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
@lvdbrink : where possible, we plan on using concepts from SOSA/SSN. However, where we've added new concepts to OMS not covered by the current SOSA/SSN (e.g., ObservingCapability), we're looking for alternatives. Long-term goal is updating SOSA/SSN accordingly, but as we really need an updated JSON encoding ASAP, we'd prefer to start this work now, update the @context once SOSA/SSN has evolved. @lieberjosh : as you mention logical model, a question on where you see this level between conceptual and physical. Background is a discussion we have under OGC OMS based on experiences by the WMO in integrating OMS (the diagrams get really ugly as one must include both the conceptual and abstract levels of OMS), our idea is to create a [profile|logical model] where we leave out the interfaces from the conceptual model, provide the associations between abstract classes. I'd been seeing this as a logical version of the OMS conceptual model, but was told that it's a profile. Any insights from your side? -- GitHub Notification of comment by KathiSchleidt Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1372#issuecomment-1280822798 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 17 October 2022 12:59:58 UTC